Commercial feasibility
Effective demand, competition, pricing, absorption, inventory and achievable market share.

We test whether product, pricing, sales pace and financial structure can coexist within the same development before more capital is committed.
Real estate feasibility is not about forcing a spreadsheet to balance. Commercial assumptions must first be supported: who buys, which alternatives they compare, what they pay and how quickly the market can absorb the product.
We then integrate phasing, revenue, costs, financing and taxes into comparable scenarios. Sensitivity analysis shows which variables drive risk and where management has room to act.
Effective demand, competition, pricing, absorption, inventory and achievable market share.
Revenue, costs, schedule, cash flow, financing, IRR, NPV and return on equity.
Downside, base and upside cases; changes in price, velocity, costs, phasing and leverage.
Minimum conditions, critical risks, mitigants and a go, revise or no-go recommendation.
We derive sales pace and pricing from evidence rather than a financial target.
We integrate the program, phases, costs, revenue, debt and equity.
We test delays, lower pricing, cost overruns and slower absorption.
We define thresholds, risks and the actions required to proceed.
An attractive return in the base case is not enough. The development must withstand reasonable variations and preserve liquidity through the sell-out period.
The model is delivered with identifiable assumptions so the client can review, update and defend it before decision-making bodies.
Commercial feasibility tests demand, product, pricing and absorption; financial feasibility integrates those assumptions with costs, timing, debt, equity and returns.
IRR expresses the cash flow’s rate of return; NPV measures value created at a defined discount rate. Both must be read alongside risk and liquidity.
An explicit recommendation to proceed, revise or stop based on previously defined conditions and thresholds.
Yes. We audit formulas, commercial assumptions, timing, scenarios and sensitivity and document recommended changes.
No. It reduces uncertainty and makes risks visible; final performance also depends on execution, financing and market change.
An initial session helps define the asset, question, geography, timing and the most efficient scope.
Book a consultation